CLIENT SUCCESS PATENT MONETIZATION: NY LAW FIRM LICENSES ELECTRONICS OEM PATENTS TO TELECOM NETWORK PROVIDERS Challenge A New York based law firm representing a beleaguered consumer electronics manufacturer was trying to monetize the company’s patent assets related to protocol conversion procedures used in certain industrial electronics equipment. The law firm engaged Copperpod for technological research in this area and to identify the best technical evidence and companies that infringe the patent assets. Solution Copperpod reviewed the patent assets in detail alone as well as in conjunction with the client’s present and previous product offerings to understand the novelty as well as how the portfolio fit in with the client’s technological journey over the last 15 years. Based on the deep understanding of the underlying technology, Copperpod recognized that even though the patents were written keeping industrial electronics in mind (keeping with the client’s product development efforts), at least one of the patents was applicable to modern telecommunication networks as well as ad-hoc wireless networks popularized by consumer Internet of Things in years since the patents had been granted. Copperpod thus advised a 2-phased patent monetization strategy for enforcing the client’s patents. PHASE 1 Copperpod identified 8 mid-size industrial electronics companies as well as consumer IoT device manufacturers that currently infringed on at least one patent asset. We focused specifically on companies with $20-$50 million in EBITDA, with preference on companies with physical presence in either New York or Texas. Using Copperpod’s analysis and claim charts, the client was able to negotiate license agreements with all 8 companies within the first 6 months. Phase 1 helped the client achieve a number of objectives: Generate initial funding for engaging larger technical and legal teams. Prove to litigation financiers the ROI roadmap for a larger enforcement campaign. Vet the patent assets for invalidity issues and technical gaps PHASE 2 Copperpod expanded the infringement theory and identified how telecommunication networks infringed on one of the patents. The first thing our experts found that there are at least 7 possible use cases for the infringement including virtual gateways with protocol conversion to the latest IoT devices. Three of these use cases related to telecom standards widely adopted in US. After a deep literature study of the ITU-T and 3GPP standards, our experts found the particular versions and portions of the standards used by telecom companies that mapped onto at least one of the claims and Copperpod shortlisted 16 companies that used infringing gateways for converting message protocols using a communication server. Success Of the 16 companies, the client then further shortlisted 8 telecom providers and filed district court cases in Texas, California and New York using Copperpod’s analysis for fulfilling Rule 11 requirements. Copperpod remained the client’s and the outside counsel’s go-to team for technical answers throughout the campaign – which has since resulted in favorable multi-million dollar out-of-court settlements with all defendants. KEY INSIGHT A patent may be enforceable in industries and technology areas beyond the one towards which it was originally intended. KEY INSIGHT An enforcement campaign with the right mix of low priority and high value targets pays for itself right from the start.

Copperpod IP's patent consultants analyze technology products to build claim charts using document review, product demonstrations and reverse engineering. Patent Infringement Claim Charts think GREAT CLAIM CHARTS think COPPERPOD Claim charts are an essential artifact during any patent licensing or enforcement campaign, as it articulates the infringement theory in an easy to understand and difficult to refute format. Claim charts may evolve throughout a campaign, as new evidence is discovered during fact discovery, and the infringement positions become consolidated pre-trial. Copperpod has helped plaintiff attorneys prepare detailed infringement contentions and evidence of use Claim Charts on over 100 patent litigation matters. We understand the burden of proof our clients must satisfy - and work hard to make sure that our claim charts are not only thorough, on time but also explain technical concepts fully through easy-to-understand expert comments. With Copperpod, you get not just the claim chart but also ongoing support for refining and supplementing the claim chart until success through licensing or litigation. Talk to Us Indirect Patent Infringement What is it and how to prove it? Learn More When Do Claim Charts Do More Harm Than Good For Patent Litigation and Licensing? Learn More Copperpod's claim charts enable enforcement of Industrial IoT patents. Learn More CLIENT SUCCESS Copperpod helps patent owner enforce firmware generation patent against 35 System-On-Chip (SoC) Manufacturers. Read More

CLIENT SUCCESS COPPERPOD HELPS NEW ENGLAND PE FIRM INVEST IN CANADIAN HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS VENDOR Background A leading private equity firm based in Connecticut which actively invests in information services supporting healthcare, banking, trust, securities, retirement and wealth management sectors was considering investing in a Toronto-based HIPAA-compliant healthcare information systems provider. Copperpod was engaged to perform due diligence to analyze the company’s technology and help the private equity firm make an informed decision. Our team of experts formulated a holistic due diligence strategy covering several key exercises. Solution 1. IT Asset Due Diligence Copperpod analyzed all IT systems, devices and processes owned by the company to make an exhaustive inventory of the IT assets owned or leased by the company. The inventory noted, for each system: • Specifications • Date of Purchase and Life Remaining • Pricing and Current Market Price • Alternatives with Feature Comparison • Backup and Redundancy • Known Vulnerabilities 2. Code Analysis Our source code consultants analyzed the complete source code within a short period of time. We provided in depth quantitative and qualitative analysis of the existing code. Some of the reviewing parameters considered by our experts were: • Size of code base • Comment Density and Ratios • Number and Ratio of Classes and Methods • Inactive to Active Code Ratio • Open Source vs. Proprietary Code Ratio • Quality Compliance Rates Per Developer • Process and system utilized by developer Copperpod experts evaluated the existing products of the company to provide a detailed report on some of the functional parameters like: • Ease of maintenance • Legal protection • Scalability • Security • Open source liabilities • Patentable subject matter 3. Code Quality Recommendations Copperpod experts found that a significant portion of the source code developed by the company’s external contractors lacked legal copyright and trade secret notices. We recommended certain tools to automatically set up a code template with pre-filled legal terms that would prevent any future litigation and business conflicts. Also, as an added measure, to help new developers identify who to contact for specific institutional knowledge and bug resolution our experts recommended that author(s), creation dates and a brief revision history be included as comments at the top of each source code file. Copperpod also found that given the sensitive and confidential nature of their data, the company should consolidate their code into a single active and regularly backed up repository as opposed to multiple fragmented repositories. This would ensure that each checkout of code as well as data is recorded and maintained in a single secure location. Our experts also highlighted a low comment-to-code ratio in certain product source code which places high dependency on the original author and requires a longer learning curve for new developers. Success The reports and recommendations submitted by Copperpod on the source code and functional components of the company’s products enabled the client to make an informed decision on investing into the company and the company itself to strength their source code and data storage for the future. The multi-million dollar investment path taken by our client has led to aggressive expansion of the firm and its sales across US. KEY INSIGHT Appropriately commented and organized source code reduces costs of debugging and scaling the product as the company grows in team size, markets and overlapping products. KEY INSIGHT Applying appropriate copyright, trade secret and authorship notices on each source code can reduce legal costs of enforcement and help establish date of reduction to practice if the technology is ever stolen.

Copperpod IP's patent litigation consultants and technical experts identify key evidence for patent cases through source code review and reverse engineering. Teardowns & Reverse Engineering In order to reveal the true structure of an IC chip, our engineers employ Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and other similar techniques to show each individual layer in the chip. We partner with the leading testing laboratories across the country in order to leverage the best tools and the best expertise required for understanding and documenting the internal structure - while keeping costs of discovery low for the client. We tear down electronics products such as smartphones, televisions, wearables, peripherals, etc. to reveal the internal circuity and IC packages that implement core functionalities of the products. Identifying each chip in the products helps our client conduct litigation discovery in the right direction as well as improve technical accuracy of their damages/royalty calculation. Our engineers use state of the art RE techniques to decapsulate IC packages in order to reveal the technology and materials used in fabricating a given chip - as well as the general blueprint and major component blocks inside the chip. Sample Teardown Reports OnePlus 5 Download Full component-by-component analysis of the OnePlus 5. See how smart design and hardware come together to drive performance. Beats Pill Download Inside look at the engineering behind the Beats Pill speaker. Disassembled to reveal the secrets of big sound in a compact package. Nexus 7 Tablet Download Explore the essential internals of the Nexus 7 in detail. Each part exposed to highlight what made this device reliable and loved. Apple iPhone 7 Download iPhone 7 is now almost a decade old. But the meticulous internal design is still a case study for electronics designers, as our in-depth teardown shows. Blackberry Z10 Download A departure from the iconic Blackberry keyboard design, the Z10 represented many firsts for RIM. Take a look at its internals in our teardown report. boAt Stone 260 Download An internal view of the design and components of the bOAT Stone 260 Bluetooth speaker reveals some smart design choices, but not too many surprises. Want to know more about how we use reverse engineering to show evidence of patent infringement? Contact Us How does a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) work? Read More How does a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) work? Read More What is EELS (Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy)? Read More What is EDX (Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy)? Read More

CLIENT SUCCESS PRIOR ART SEARCH: COPPERPOD HELPS NY LAW FIRM FILE INTER PARTES REVIEW PETITION Challenge A New York law firm engaged Copperpod IP for a prior art search to identify patents or printed publications that invalidate the claims of a subject patent asserted against their client. The subject patent disclosed a method for wirelessly distributing one or more images from a capturing device to a receiving one, wherein the receiving device automatically filters the receiving images based on a particular topic, theme or individual. Solution Copperpod reviewed the patent in detail to understand the novelty as well as how the technology in the subject patent may be implemented or used in the products. Copperpod used patent search databases (e.g. Orbit Intelligence) to perform complex searches (including use of wildcard expressions and operators) based on the keywords relevant to the novelty of the subject patent. Our experts also performed NPL (Non-Patent Literature) searches in all major and reliable databases (including but not limited to any type of literature such as research papers published in academic journals or presented in any conference, product user manuals, user guides and/or product application documents, and Non-Digitized NPL (such as offline literature such as magazines, newspapers, books, pictures, academic journals and/or user manual)) to deliver the best results. In addition, our experts used a number of innovative approaches: Classification-based search : Identifying key patent classes (preferably, IPC classifications due to their global applicability) and limiting patent search to those classes increases the odds of finding the best prior art within that final set. Citation-based search : Backward citations as well as forward citations can reveal other prior art on a deeper second-level analysis: Backward Citations of Backward Citations Other Forward Citations of Backward Citations Other Backward Citations of Forward Citations Inventor-based search : One or more inventors named on the subject patent may have published prior art that ends up invalidating the claims of the subject patent. Combined with the citation traversal – where other work attributable to the inventors named on backward citations and forward citations can also reveal important prior art. Copperpod also consulted with academicians and industry experts who were working on the technology around the same time when the subject patent was granted. Read our article “New Approaches to Prior Art Search ” to know more about our no-stone-left-unturned approach to prior art searches. After a deep literature study of wireless transmission and filtering of images, our experts found 10 similar patents talking about the image-capturing equipment consisting of a wireless transmitter, wireless receiver and a processor used to filter the photographic images captured. We created a result-feature matrix, vital for the report, which proved to be extremely beneficial while understanding the relevancy of each prior art with the claims of the subject patent. Up to this point, our team had gone through thousands of related patents that gave us and the client the required confidence for further proceedings. The final report also included claim wise mapping of the subject patent with the highly relevant prior art. KEY INSIGHT Web archives can help immensely in finding literature about old discontinued products that may constitute good prior art. KEY INSIGHT A result-feature matrix can not only help prioritize prior art references, but also streamline selection of prior art combinations for §103 obviousness arguments. Success Using Copperpod’s analysis and results, the client successfully filed an Inter-Partes Review (IPR) petition with the Patent Trial and Appellate Board (PTAB). The petition was subsequently instituted for the key claims asserted against the client.

ENERGY & INFRASTRUCTURE Total investment in the U.S. energy sector was valued at USD 350 billion in 2018 As energy companies adopt technologies to equip themselves and their clients to take full advantage of the smart grid, they need to think about how to protect their native technologies and protect themselves against patent infringement lawsuits. Obtaining the advice and guidance of counsel is a relatively simple and inexpensive way to protect a company’s proprietary technology and avoid common pitfalls of such lawsuits. Oil and natural gas provide the majority of the energy, and the energy infrastructure –including pipelines, railroads, highways, waterways and ports— to make sure this energy is available when needed. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), total investment in the U.S. energy sector was valued at $350 billion in 2018 (the second-largest in the world). That same year, total foreign direct investment in the U.S. reached $172.8 billion. Smart meters are here. Solar panels are on rooftops. State energy laws now include energy storage provisions, and automobile manufacturers are working together with the energy industry to set up the next generation of vehicles powered by electricity. Miniaturized sensors and fiber optic sensors in the production system could be used to boost production or increase the overall recovery of oil and gas from a reservoir. Drones could also be used to inspect pipelines (which are often spread over extended areas) and hard-to-reach equipment such as flare stacks and remote offshore facilities. Want to know more about how we help clients in enforcing oil, energy & infrastructure patents? Know More LATEST INSIGHTS Airborne Wind Energy (AWE) System: Future of Wind Energy Energy & Infrastructure Photovoltaic (PV) Solar Energy - Renewable Source of Energy for Water Pumping Systems Energy & Infrastructure Strategic Position of Russia in the Global Energy Supply Energy & Infrastructure Solar Panels and Solar Tracker Systems Energy & Infrastructure Wireless Battery Charging Solution for Electric Vehicles (EV) Automotives Flexible Batteries: State of the Art Energy & Infrastructure PATENT INFRINGEMENT ANALYSIS: COPPERPOD ENABLES ENFORCEMENT OF INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS (IIoT) PATENTS BY HOUSTON ENTREPRENEUR

MULTIMEDIA & CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORKS The rising use of the internet for data and media transmission and heightening consumer interest in video on demand (VOD) and OTT platforms for entertainment have sown the seeds in the content delivery network (CDN) industry globally. The CDN market is segregated into media delivery, web performance optimization, DRM and transcoding, monitoring and analytics, transparent caching, data security and cloud storage by solution. Rich media and video content applications have climbed tremendously in the past decade, resulting in exponential growth for the CDN market. CDNs not only improve speed and quality for video content and streaming, they also provide high levels of reliable security in terms of scalability, owing to lower costs of data storage and the outsourcing of content management. In view of IP protection in the media and broadcasting industry, the shielding and enforcement of intellectual property has gained high importance. IP is not limited to technology companies but it is treasured for every business which invests huge sums in research and development for creating indigenous products. Out-licensing patented technologies is a vital part of the intellectual management and to induce more revenues. Copperpod provides Patent Portfolio Analysis , Infringement Claim Charts , Prior Art Search , Product Testing and network packet capture through packet sniffing, penetration testing and information gathering tools such as Wireshark, Fiddler, BlueRanger and PacketRanger. Copperpod’s experts are well versed in computer based interactive technologies such as OTT platforms, PlayReady, WideVine, FairPlay etc. Copperpod also provides Source Code Experts to review software source code in order to uncover hard-to-find infringement evidence. Contact Us To Know More DUE DILIGENCE: CALIFORNIA PE FIRM ACQUIRES CANADIAN CLOUD COMPUTING PROVIDER PRIOR ART SEARCH: COPPERPOD HELPS NY LAW FIRM FILE INTER PARTES REVIEW PETITION LATEST INSIGHTS From Saturday Morning Laughs to Courtroom Battles When Cartoons Become Legal Titans Multimedia Key Technology and IP Categories in Netflix’s Patent Landscape Multimedia Patent Landscape: Oracle Corporation Cloud Computing From Passive Playlists to Predictive Soundscapes: Inside Spotify’s Patent-Powered Future Mobile Applications Adobe: From PostScript to Agentic AI – What’s Next? Artificial Intelligence V2X Communication Technologies: The Future of Connected Mobility Operating Systems

Copperpod IP's patent consultants analyze technology products to build claim charts using document review, product demonstrations and reverse engineering. Evidence of Use Evidence of Use (EoU) claim charts are an essential artifact during any patent licensing or enforcement campaign, as it articulates the infringement theory in an easy to understand and difficult to refute format. Copperpod analyzes technology products to identify key evidence of patent infringement. Our EoU reports help attorneys articulate, evaluate and negotiate patent infringement disputes - and form the basis for the overall patent monetization campaign for the client. We work with clients throughout the case so that our evidence of use reports, claim charts and patent infringement contentions consistently align with the case facts. Indirect Patent Infringement What is it and how to prove it? Read More CLIENT SUCCESS Patent Infringement Analysis: Copperpod helps patent owner enforce firmware generation patent against 35 System-On-Chip (SoC) Manufacturers. Read More When Do Claim Charts Do More Harm Than Good For Patent Litigation and Licensing? Read More

Copperpod IP's patent consultants analyze technology products to build claim charts using document review, product demonstrations and reverse engineering. CLAIM CHART What is a Claim Chart ? A claim chart is a visual representation of evidence showing how each claim limitation has been implemented by an infringing product or service. While formatting can vary, at a minimum a claim chart lists all relevant claim limitations in one column, and provides evidence (such as screenshots or text from product marketing material, developer documentation, FAQs, videos, network tests and/or photographs of the product or teardowns of the product) in another column against each of the claim limitations. Great claim charts, such as those made by Copperpod, also provide detailed analyst comments explaining how the evidence shows that the charted product or service implements the claim limitation, and annotations highlighting the most important portions of the cited evidence. Frequently Asked Questions Patent Infringement Claim Charts What is a Claim Chart? A patent infringement claim chart is a visual representation of evidence showing how each claim limitation has been implemented by an infringing product or service. It is an essential artifact during any patent licensing or enforcement campaign, as it articulates the infringement theory in an easy to understand and difficult to refute format. How much does a patent infringement claim chart cost? A typical patent infringement claim chart costs between USD 500-3000, depending upon number of claims, claim complexity and the technology. Depending on volume, we also price claim chart projects either on an hourly rate or on a fixed-price basis. Read more " When Claim Charts Do More Harm Than Good For Patent Litigation and Licensing " What is the turnaround time for a good patent infringement claim chart? A good patent infringement claim chart takes 5-8 hours. Copperpod IP prepares litigation ready claim charts to serve our clients at the speed of need. The chart provides detailed analyst comments explaining how the evidence shows that the charted product or service implements the claim limitation, and annotations highlighting the most important portions of the cited evidence. Contact us here . What types of evidence should be included in a patent infringement claim chart? Evidence for a claim chart can come from a variety of sources, such as product manuals, product videos, technical standards, network packet captures, product tear down and reverse engineering , product testing and demonstrations and even source code of the software running on the product. Can a patent infringement claim chart cover multiple products? Depending on the jurisdiction and particular case details, a single claim chart can cover multiple products, though these products would usually be substantially similar to each other. Read more about the target scouting process. Can expired patents be enforced? Yes, expired patents can be enforced. The condition is, if the infringement happened during the active period of the patent then you have the right to sue for damages accrued over that portion of the active period - provided also of course the damages have accrued within the time allowed by the statute of limitations. Do your patent infringement claim charts include reverse engineering evidence? Yes, wherever applicable, Copperpod's patent infringement claim charts include hard-to-find and harder-to-refute evidence. We use a variety of Reverse Engineering (RE) techniques such as SEM, TEM, EELS, EDX, and packet sniffing to furnish such evidence of use. Do your patent infringement claim charts include source code evidence? Yes, wherever applicable, Copperpod's patent infringement claim charts include source code review evidence. Copperpod's source code experts navigate through the source code using specialized tools and software and are well versed in all modern programming languages and platforms. Can you prepare a patent infringement claim chart for a discontinued product? Yes, discontinued products can be charted for patent infringement. But due to the statute of limitations, you may not be able to recover damages beyond a certain time (often, 5-10 years) before the complaint for patent infringement is filed with the relevant court. Amazon APEX: A New Cost-Effective Venue for Enforcing Patent Rights Patent Brokerage: A Comprehensive Guide Adapting Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) for Accurate Patent Valuation ITC: Understanding Section 337 of the United States Tariff Act and its Storied Evolution Patent Pools for Efficient Sharing of Technology Augmented Reality (AR) in Car Navigation

CLIENT SUCCESS SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY FIRM LICENSES REAL-TIME DEDUPLICATION PATENTS TO CLOUD COMPUTING COMPANIES Challenge An international software company was looking to monetize a patent related to storage medium preventing unauthorized reproduction or copying. The company engaged Copperpod to review the patent in detail, identify infringing products and monetize the portfolio for the products that potentially infringe the patents. The patent described an apparatus for writing checksum information on a data content on a storage medium. The apparatus comprises a provider for providing checksum information based on the data content and a writer for writing the data content. Further, the checksum information on the storage medium is such that a baseline reader and an enhanced reader can read the data content. The enhanced reader can read and process the checksum information and the baseline reader ignores, skips or does not read the checksum information. KEY INSIGHT Claim limitations such as "reader" and "provider", need not be hardware components, and may instead be implemented wholly in software. Solution After detailed study of the patent, our team identified deduplication process technologies used by cloud storage providers as potentially mapping on several claims of the patent. We shortlisted 10 storage solution companies that perform server-side deduplication and verified the infringement in each case, following which 10 descriptive infringement contentions mapping key evidence from target products against each claim were prepared for the client to pursue further monetization of the patent. Success Copperpod experts worked closely with the client's outside counsel providing ad-hoc technical analysis throughout the monetization campaign including refining positions after case filing and during settlement negotiations.

CLIENT SUCCESS DUE DILIGENCE: CALIFORNIA PE FIRM ACQUIRES CANADIAN CLOUD COMPUTING PROVIDER Challenge An established private equity firm in California which actively invests in information services supporting healthcare, bank ing, trust, securities, retirement and wealth management sectors was considering investing in a Toronto-based document processing and compliance provider focused on automotive and car deale rships across North America. Copperpod was engaged to perform due diligence to analyze the company’s technology and help the private equity firm make an informed decision. Our team of experts formulated a holistic due diligence strategy covering several key exercises. Solution Code Analysis Our source code consulta nts analyzed the complete source code within a short period of time. We provided in depth quantitative and qualitative analysis of the existing code. Some of the reviewing parameters considered by our experts were: • Size of code base • Comment Density and Ratios • Number and Ratio of Classes and Methods • Inactive to Active Code Ratio • Open Source vs. Proprietary Code Ratio • Quality Compliance Rates Per Developer • Process and system utilized by developer Copperpod experts evaluated the existing products of the company to provide a detailed report on some of the functional parameters like: • Ease of maintenance • Legal protection • Scalability • Security • Open source liabilities • Patentable subject matter IP Litigation Activity Our patent litigation consultants identified past and current litigations as well as significant court verdicts that affected or were likely to affect the products, technologies and the applicable market segments of the company. Code Quality Recommendations Copperpod experts found that a significant portion of the source code developed by the company’s external contractors lacked legal copyright and trade secret notices. We recommended certain tools to automatically set up a code template with pre-filled legal terms that would prevent any future litigation and business conflicts. Also, as an added measure, to help new developers identify who to contact for specific institutional knowledge and bug resolution our experts recommended that author(s), creation dates and a brief revision history be included as comments at the top of each source code file. Copperpod also found that given the sensitive and confidential nature of their data, the company should consolidate their code into a single active and regularly backed up repository as opposed to multiple fragmented repositories. This would ensure that each checkout of code as well as data is recorded and maintained in a single secure location. Our experts also highlighted a low comment-to-code ratio in certain product source code which places high dependency on the original author and requires a longer learning curve for new developers. KEY INSIGHT Appropriately commented and organized source code reduces costs of debugging and scaling the product as the company grows in team size, markets and overlapping products KEY INSIGHT Applying appropriate copyright, trade secret and authorship notices on each source code can reduce legal costs of enforcement and help establish date of reduction to practice if the technology is ever stolen. Success The reports and recommendations submitted by Copperpod on the source code and functional components of the company’s products enabled the client to make an informed decision on investing into the company and the company itself to strength their source code and data storage for the future. The multi-million dollar investment path taken by our client has led to aggressive expansion of the firm and its sales across US.

Unlock the full potential of your wearables technology with Copperpod IP. Our expert team provides tailored IP solutions to help you protect and monetize your ideas. From patent prosecution to licensing negotiations, we can help you maximize the value of your intellectual property. Visit us today to learn more about our specialized services for the wearables industry. WEARABLES Wearable technology has emerged as the omnipresent technology of the twentieth century. The worldwide demand for wearable technology exceeded USD 32.63 billion in 2019 and the industry is projected to expand at a CAGR OF 15.9% from 2020 to 2027. With the advent of IoT technology, a significant amount of power can be stored in small devices such that wearables are not left limited to eyeglasses, hearing aids, wristwatches, and pacemakers alone. The ecosystem of this industry includes product manufacturers, research and development associations, component manufacturers and suppliers, software solution providers, and end-users. Given the developments and the converging of information and communication technologies gives rise to new risks and opportunities for intellectual property as well - which is crucial for gaining a competitive edge. Copperpod has deep technical expertise on evaluating wearable technology hardware as well as software - and has evaluated more than a 100 such products using Source Code Review , Teardowns and Product Testing to help our clients understand and articulate how each product works. Contact Us To Know More LATEST INSIGHTS The Filing Fee Diaries - Ordinary People, Extraordinary Ideas Wearables Amazon APEX: A New Cost-Effective Venue for Enforcing Patent Rights Intellectual Property The Rise and Future of AI in the Footwear Industry Operating Systems Bridging Minds and Machines: The Rise of Brain-Computer Interfaces Artificial Intelligence The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Athletic Footwear Innovation Intellectual Property Artificial Intelligence in Fashion World: Transforming Shopping, Design, and Sustainability Multimedia