• Copperpod

IBM wins $82 million against Groupon over e-commerce patents

A U.S. jury awarded IBM $82.5 million after finding that Groupon infringed four of its e-commerce patents. It had been a running battle between the two companies since 2016, when IBM accused Groupon of failure to license technology and intellectual property which provided the foundation of e-commerce. Initially, IBM sought damages worth $167 million, which Groupon managed to bring down to half its value (source).

The verdict underlines IBM’S booming intellectual property licensing business, which brought $1.19 billion for the company the previous year. IBM holds more than 45000 patents and is widely regarded as the most prolific patentee in modern history.

Midway through their first full day of deliberations in Wilmington, Delaware, IBM had the jurors in their corner, who decided that Groupon had willfully infringed the patents – which developed a possibility of an increase in the damages award.

"IBM invests nearly $6 billion annually in research and development, producing innovations for society," IBM spokesman Doug Shelton said after the verdict. "We rely on our patents to protect our innovations."

Groupon consequently has started to figure out its chances of a comeback after the hard hit – considering post trial motions and appeal. "We continue to believe that we do not infringe on any valid IBM patents," he said. "To the extent these patents have any value at all -- which we believe they do not -- the value is far less than what the jury awarded."

Two of the patents came out of an online service called Prodigy, which was started by IBM in the late 1980’s. It offered its subscribers access to a broad range of networked services, including news, weather, shopping, bulletin boards, and a variety of other features. Another patent is related to guarding information in a continuing conversation between clients and servers. The fourth is related to authentication, and expires in 2025.

IBM drew attention during the trial to the fact that the same patents had been licensed to Google, Amazon, and Facebook, and each company paid between $20 million and $50 million. “The new kid on the block refuses to take responsibility for using these inventions,” as stated by IBM lawyer John Desmarias. This is also the first time in 20 years that IBM managed to get a filed patent lawsuit to the start of a jury trial.

This was an important case in the online advertising and marketing sector, and underwent a detailed examination. Ten companies, including GoDaddy Operating Co., LinkedIn and Twitter had requested confidentiality on information related to their prior IBM patent deals.

In an interview after the verdict, John Desmarais shed some light on how recent reforms, designed to fight abuses in the patent system have made it harder for companies to protect their intellectual property – which encouraged firms to resist IBM's demand for a licensing fee.

"It's put companies like IBM, who have real portfolios, real R&D investment dollars, in a situation where they have to go to court," Desmarais said. Although IBM emerged intact from the Groupon trial, he said "it took years and millions of dollars when it should have taken a couple of meetings."

IBM was also fighting, part of Booking Holdings Inc. on similar grounds. U.S. District Judge Leonard Stark, who also presided over the IBM-Groupon trial, ruled in October that infringed on only 3 of the four patents in question. IBM has appealed in response to this verdict.

#ibm #patents #ecommerce #software #judgments #news

Recent Posts

See All

U.S.C. §101: Patent Subject Matter Eligibility

While drafting a patent application, it goes through the scrutiny of whether it falls under the legal requirements for patentability or not. The description of an invention must be so clear that anyon

What is Doctrine of Equivalents?

While there are multiple ways to skin a cat (see discussion on indirect infringement and direct infringement here), patent infringement can occur in two forms. The first is literal infringement. Liter

In re DABUS: Can AI be granted patents?

A landmark decision in relation to the curious case of DABUS AI and Stephen Thaler set a major precedent for patent eligibility for Artificial Intelligence (AI) created inventions. On July 29, 2020, S

Copperpod is one of the world's leading technology research and forensics firms, with an acute focus on management and monetization of intellectual property assets. With offices in US and Asia, our global team of consultants has helped clients realize over $1 billion in revenues from patent licensing, jury verdicts and patent portfolio transactions.

Follow Us on LinkedIn

  • LinkedIn

© 2019 Carthaginian Ventures Private Limited. All Rights Reserved.                          Privacy Policy